美国政府医学研究所承认注射疫苗有严重副作用！
关键词：疫苗 疫苗副作用 疫苗机制 疫苗污染 病毒 流产胚细胞 危害健康
美国政府药学研究所（IOM）在审查了1000多项疫苗研究之后发现14种危险的副作用与注射疫苗相关后不久前承认：“疫苗并非无副作用，或并非无‘负面作用’” 。美国国家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）关于药学研究所（IOM）的报告最近发表的声明强调“这次的审查受到有关疫苗负面影响知识缺口的束缚”；“真相是，没有任何人知道在美国有多少疫苗受害者：没有人知道在每6个孩子中为什么有一名有学习障碍的孩子；或者每9个孩子中为什么有一名有气喘的孩子；或者每100个美国人中为什么有1名患孤独症；或者每450个美国人中为什么有1名患糖尿病，他们的慢性抑郁症、疾病与残疾能够回追到疫苗反应，这些疫苗反应过去百年来一直被公共健康官员与医生们忽略不考虑为仅仅是‘巧合’”。本文及其系列文章还揭示：注射疫苗并不时我们更加健康；自然免疫力与疫苗激发免疫力的区别？世界最知名葛兰素--史克疫苗生产公司疫苗对美国百万儿童、对世界各地3000多万儿童注射后竟然发现受到猪病毒DNA的污染；长期以来向公众掩盖的一项令人震惊的事实：某些疫苗生产中与美容护肤霜中使用了人类流产胚细胞；无良商家与官方勾结推动某些疫苗的真正目的是利润而非健康！
Vaccines Have Serious Side Effects The Institute of Medicine Says So!
美国政府医学研究所承认：注射疫苗有严重副作用！
转载自：
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/09/27/vaccines-are-dangerous-says-the-government.aspx?e_cid=20111002_SNL_MS_1
翻译与转载者：陈一文（cheniwan@mx.cei.gov.cn）
（80年代两届全国青联委员）
《新浪网》“陈一文顾问博客”转载：http://blog.sina.com.cn/cheniwan
《陈一文顾问网站》：http://sea3000.net/cheniwan
By Dr. Mercola | September 27 2011
作者：莫克拉博士 发布日期：2011年9月27日
As I have long stated, and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) now admits:
如同我早就声明的那样，美国政府药学研究所（Institute of Medicine -- IOM）现在也承认：
"Vaccines are not free from side effects, or "adverse effects""
“疫苗并非无副作用，或并非无‘负面作用’”
This admission came after a review of more than 1,000 vaccine studies, which was intended to assess the scientific evidence in the medical literature about specific adverse events associated with eight vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella (MMR); varicella (chickenpox); influenza; hepatitis A; hepatitis B; HPV; diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (DtaP); and meningococcal.
这一点是在审查了1000多项疫苗研究之后承认的。这些疫苗研究的目的是评估医学文献中关于八种具体的疫苗相关的特点负面作用的科学证据。这八种疫苗针对（1）麻疹--腮腺炎--风疹MMR疫苗（measles-- mumps--rubella – MMR）；（2）水痘（varicella – chickenpox）；（3）流行性感冒（influenza）；（4）甲型肝炎（hepatitis A）；（5）乙型肝炎（hepatitis B）；（6）人乳头状病毒（HPV）；（7）白喉（diphtheria）、破伤风（tetanus）、非细胞的百日咳（acellular pertussis – DtaP）；与 （8）脑膜炎（meningococca）。
The adverse events selected for IOM review were ones for which people had submitted vaccine injury claims to the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). A convincing causal relationship was found for 14 adverse events and certain vaccines.
药学研究所选择进行审查的疫苗负面事件是人们提交给“疫苗损伤赔偿计划（Vaccine Injury Compensation Program -- VICP）的疫苗损伤索赔中报告的负面事件。对某些疫苗发现令人信服的因果关系的14种负面事件。
14 Dangerous Side Effects Linked to Vaccination, IOM Report Says
美国政府医学研究所承认：有14种危险的副作用与注射疫苗相关
In the first comprehensive safety review in nearly two decades, the Institute of Medicine found convincing scientic evidence for a causal relationship between certain vaccines and serious adverse health outcomes. This includes:
近二十年来第一次这样的综合性安全审查中，美国政府医学研究所发现了某些疫苗与严重的负面健康结果之间的有说服力的科学证据。它们包括：
Chickenpox Vaccine
水痘疫苗
l Vaccine strain varicella zoster infection after vaccination without other organ involvement;
l 疫苗注射后出现了不涉及其他器官的疫苗株水痘带状疹子感染；
l Vaccine strain varicella zoster infection and subsequent infection resulting in pneumonia, encephalitis, meningitis or hepatitis in individuals with demonstrated immunodeficiences;
l 疫苗株水痘带状疹子感染以及随后在表现免疫缺陷的个人中造成肺炎（pneumonia）、 脑炎（encephalitis）、脑膜炎（meningitis）或肝炎（hepatitis）。
Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccine
麻疹—腮腺炎—风疹（MMR）疫苗
l Measles inclusion body encephalitis
l 麻疹包涵体脑炎
l Febrile seizures, a type of seizure that occurs in infants and young children in association with fever
l 急性发热（Febrile seizures），在婴幼儿与儿童发生的伴随发烧的一种急性症
l Short-term joint pain (arthralgia) in children and women
l 儿童与妇女中出现短期关节痛（arthralgia）
Other findings revealed:
其他的发现揭示：
l Six types of vaccines -- MMR, varicella zoster (chickenpox), influenza, hepatitis B, meningococcal, and tetanus-containing vaccines -- are linked to anaphylaxis (severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction). The HPV vaccine was also linked to anaphylaxis in yeast-sensitive individuals.
l 六种疫苗 -- （1）麻疹--腮腺炎--风疹MMR疫苗（measles-- mumps--rubella – MMR）、（2）水痘带状疹子疫苗（varicella zoster, chickenpox）、（3）流行性感冒疫苗（influenza）、（4）乙型肝炎疫苗（hepatitis B）、（5）脑膜炎疫苗（meningococcal）与（6）破伤风疫苗（tetanus）与过敏反应（anaphylaxis）有关联（严重的、潜在危害生命的过敏反应）。人乳头状病毒疫苗也与酵母过敏个人中的过敏反应（anaphylaxis）相关。
l Injection of any vaccine in general can lead to sudden fainting (syncope) and symptoms of deltoid bursitis, or shoulder inflammation
l 注射任何这些疫苗总的来讲能够导致土壤昏晕昏厥（syncope）以及三角肌滑液囊炎（deltoid bursitis），或者肩膀炎症（inflammation）。
l Two Canadian flu vaccines were linked to oculo-respiratory syndrome characterized by conjunctivitis, facial swelling, and mild respiratory symptoms.
l 两种加拿大流行性感冒疫苗与奥库拉呼吸系统综合症（oculo-respiratory syndrome）相关，特征包括结膜炎（conjunctivitis）、面部肿胀（facial swelling）以及温和的呼吸系统症状（mild respiratory symptoms）。
l Scientific research suggests that many people, who experience an adverse reaction to vaccines, have individual susceptibility that can make them at higher risk for experiencing acute and chronic health problems after vaccination due to biodiversity (genetic variations) within populations; age at the time of vaccination; immune deficiencies; coinciding infections/illnesses; and other environmental exposures, (such as toxins, traumas).
l 科学研究提议，对疫苗有负面反应经历的许多人，具有个性化的易受损害脆弱性，使他们在相同人群中在疫苗注射后对急性的与慢性的健康问题因下述因素具有更高风险，如生物多样性（基因不同）；注射疫苗的年龄与时间；免疫缺陷；同时有感染/疾病；其他环境性暴露（如毒素、外伤）。
Too Little Evidence Available to Effectively Evaluate Most Side Effects
对评估大部分副作用来讲可以获得的证据太少
Despite conclusive findings by IOM linking certain vaccines to brain inflammation, febrile seizures and potentially life-threatening infections like pneumonia and meningitis in susceptible individuals, most of the media headlines about the IOM’s 600-page report are spinning the reports conclusions and stating that “few adverse effects are caused by the vaccines reviewed in this report.”
尽管美国政府药学研究所（IOM）确凿发现某些疫苗与某些症状有关联，如脑部炎症（brain inflammation）、急性发热（febrile seizures）、已遭受损害脆弱个人中像肺炎（pneumonia）与脑膜炎（meningitis）这样的潜在威胁生命的感染，大部分媒体关于药学研究所（IOM）这个600页报告的头条将报告的结论描绘为“这个报告伸出了疫苗造成的少数一些负面影响。”
The truth is that the IOM Committee came to this startling conclusion, which they admitted openly and that is:
真实的情况是药学研究所获得他们令人震惊的结论时公开承认
"For the vast majority, (135 vaccine-adverse event pairs), the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship."
“对绝大多数，（135项疫苗—负面事件对），获得的证据不足于接受或者否定一项因果关系。”
In other words, for the majority of side effects and health conditions that have occurred in conjunction with vaccinations, they simply have no idea whether the vaccine caused the problem or not. In fact, the IOM Committee warned that there should be no misinterpretation of the fact that they DO NOT KNOW whether or not more than 100 very serious reported health problems linked to the eight vaccines they studied are caused by those vaccines. In most cases, the Committee was unable to come to a conclusion because there are no or very few scientific studies investigating the reported vaccine-related adverse event or the studies, which are published in the medical literature, are methodologically flawed in some way.
换句话说，对于与疫苗注射后发生的大部分副作用与健康状况而言，他们完全不懂疫苗注射是否导致出现了的问题。事实上，药学研究所的委员会警告，对如下情况不应做误导性解释：他们不知道100种所报告的与八种疫苗相关联的非常严重健康问题是由这些疫苗造成的，还是不是由它们造成的。在大部分情况下，该委员会未能够取得结论的原因，是因为医学文献中仅发表了很少对疫苗相关负面事件或研究进行审查的科学研究论文，而且它们采用的方法学在一定程度上有缺陷。
And isn’t this precisely the problem? The current vaccination schedule is a one-size-fits-all approach that has never been proven safe!
这不准确就是问题所在？目前的疫苗安排是“同一剂量满足所有的人”的方式，但是这种方式从来没有证实是安全的！
As Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), stated:
如芭芭拉·罗·费舍（Barbara Loe Fisher），国家疫苗信息中心（National Vaccine Information Center -- NVIC）创立者强调：
"The truth is, nobody knows how many vaccine victims there are in America, how many of the 1 in 6 learning disabled children; or the 1 in 9 with asthma; or the 1 in 100 who develop autism; or the 1 in 450 who become diabetic, can trace their chronic inflammation, disease and disability back to vaccine reactions that have been dismissed by public health officials and doctors for the past century as just "a coincidence.""
“真相是，没有任何人知道在美国有多少疫苗受害者：没有人知道在每6个孩子中为什么有一名有学习障碍（learning disabled）的孩子；或者每9个孩子中为什么有一名有气喘（asthma）的孩子；或者每100个美国人中为什么有1名患孤独症（autism）；或者每450个美国人中为什么有1名患糖尿病（diabetic），他们的慢性抑郁症（inflammation）、疾病与残疾能够回追到疫苗反应，这些疫苗反应过去百年来一直被公共健康官员与医生们忽略不考虑为仅仅是‘巧合’”。
Or, if they aren’t dismissed as coincidence, they are dismissed on the grounds that there’s not enough data available to establish a “causal relationship.” This is exactly the reason why unbiased vaccine safety studies are so desperately and urgently need.
或者，如果它们没有作为“巧合”忽略不考虑，它们在没有建立“因果关系”足够数据基础上不予考虑。这就是为什么无偏见的疫苗安全研究如此紧急必要。
NVIC recently issued a statement regarding IOM's new report, noting this very fact:
国家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）最近发表了关于美国政府药学研究所新的报告的一个声明，特别关注这一事实：
"The [IOM] Committee was hampered by the same gaps in knowledge regarding vaccine adverse effects that hampered IOM Committees undertaking the same task in 1991 and 1994. For the majority of potential vaccine adverse effects reported to be associated with vaccines, this IOM Committee like those before, came to the conclusion that the biological mechanism and epidemiological evidence published in the medical literature is simply inadequate to accept or reject a causation finding.
“（药学研究所）委员会这次的审查受到有关疫苗负面影响知识缺口的束缚，与药学研究所委员会1991年与1994年承担同样任务时受到的有关疫苗负面影响知识缺口束缚相同。对于报告中涉及到的与疫苗相关联的大部分潜在疫苗负面影响，这个药学研究所委员会像他们以前一样，得到结论：医学文献中发表的鸭血生物学机制与流行病学证据不足以接受或否定一项显示因果关系的发现。
This is a very important conclusion, because the current state of science holds no answers for parents and doctors, who for many years have reported multiple vaccine injuries to the government's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
“这是一项重要的结论，因为目前状态的科学对孩子们的家长与医生们给不出答案，他们多年来向政府的‘疫苗负面事件报告系统（Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System -- VAERS）’报告了多重疫苗损伤。
Insufficient scientific evidence to make a call about whether certain vaccines do or do not cause a wide range of serious health conditions, such as encephalitis, encephalopathy, stroke, asthma, autism, SIDS, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, lupus, and blood disorders, is problematical when these vaccines are mandated by law to be used by every child and recommended for many adults.
“对与某些疫苗是或者不造成广泛范围严重健康状况，例如脑炎（encephalitis）、脑病（encephalopathy）、中风（stroke）、哮喘（asthma）、孤独症（autism）、婴儿猝死综合症（SIDS）、多发性硬化症（multiple sclerosis）、关节炎（arthritis）、狼疮（lupus）以及血液失调（blood disorders），在法规强制规定对每个孩子以及推荐对许多成年人注射这些疫苗情况下，由于缺乏足够科学证据而不能发出警告就成了一个大问题。
The Committee's clear acknowledgement that there is a lack of adequate scientific understanding about the way that vaccines act in the human body, including how, when, why and for whom they are harmful, is confirmation that more and higher quality vaccine safety science is urgently needed."
（药学研究所）委员会清楚承认缺乏关于疫苗在人类体内如何如何作用的足够科学理解，包括缺乏各种疫苗如何、何时、为什么以及它们对什么样的人有害的足够科学理解，这确认目前紧急需要高质量的疫苗安全科学。”
Why Are So Many Children Receiving Extra Vaccines?
为什么这么多的孩子注射额外次数疫苗？
Adding insult to injury, a separate review by independent researchers looking at the 1999-2003 National Immunization Survey data found that nearly 10 percent of children aged 19-35 months have received extra vaccinations and the rate was highest for children who received vaccines at more than one facility or from more than one provider. This is the last thing that kids need, considering that just about every year one or more “new” vaccines are added to the already overloaded schedule.
令疫苗造成的损伤更为糟糕，由独立研究者们进行的一项单独的审查对1999-2003年度国家免疫调查（National Immunization Survey）数据进行了研究，发现19-35个月年龄儿童的10%获得额外次数疫苗注射，而且，对于从一家以上机构或多家提供方获得疫苗的儿童的额外疫苗次数最高。这是孩子们所需要的最后一件事，特别考虑到每年出现一种或更多种“新”的疫苗出现加入到目前已经过载的安排。
As it stands, children are expected to get 48 doses of 14 vaccines by the time they’re just 6 years old – starting with the first vaccine given on the day of birth in the newborn nursery! By age 18, federal public health officials say they should have gotten a total of 69 doses of 16 vaccines.
从目前情况看，现在的孩子到他们6岁时生长过程中应期望注射14种疫苗总共注射48次 – 从出生第一天在新生儿室注射第一次疫苗开始！到18岁时，联邦公共健康官员说，他们注射了16种总共69次疫苗。
This “prescription” is the same for every U.S. child, even though it’s well known that all children are not the same biologically – as the recent Institute of Medicine report clearly points out - and some children will not be able to survive the currently recommended vaccine schedule without suffering serious harm to their health. And if you take your child to multiple health care providers or facilities, the odds are high that they may be mistakenly given “extra” vaccines on top of the recommended schedule.
美国每一个孩子获得相同这样的“处方”，尽管人们都了解所有的孩子在生物学方面并不相同 – 如同药学研究所最近的报告清楚指出的那样 – 某些孩子不能承受目前推荐的疫苗安排因而造成对他们健康严重的损伤。如果你带你的孩子去多家保健服务提供者或机构的话，他们错误地“额外”注射他们最为推荐安排的疫苗的几率较高。
To avoid this, if you do decide to vaccinate, be sure you keep a detailed record of which vaccinations your child has received, and when – do not rely on your doctor’s office to do that for you. It is also a good idea to have your child’s vaccination history on hand in the event there is a vaccine reaction.
为了避免这种情况，如果你决定注射疫苗的话，一定确保你保留这你的孩子过去注射过的所有疫苗的详细记录，以及何时注射 – 而不要依赖于你的医生的办公室为你这样做。出现疫苗反应时，随身携带你的孩子的疫苗注射历史记录是一个好主意。
You Can View Common Vaccine Reactions Right Now
你现在可以看通常的疫苗反应
The IOM report may feel there is too little evidence to make conclusions about vaccine-induced side effects, but you can make a conclusion for yourself by reading the entire IOM report yourself at:
药学研究所可能感到做出对某些疫苗导致副作用结论的证据过少，但是你可以通过读整个报告做出自己的结论：
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx
You can also review the vaccine adverse event reports made by doctors and patients or parents themselves to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national surveillance database to which anyone can post a vaccine reaction report. VAERS was established in 1986 under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which requires health professionals to report serious health problems, including hospitalizations, injuries and deaths, that occur after the administration of routinely recommended vaccines.
你也可以审查医生与患者或者家长们自己向联邦“疫苗负面事件报告系统”（Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System -- VAERS）的疫苗负面事件报告。这是任何人可以提交疫苗反应报告的国家监视网。“疫苗负面事件报告系统”1986年依据“国家儿童疫苗损伤法令”（National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act）建立，要求健康专业人士报告严重的健康问题，包括注射常规推荐一秒后发生的住院治疗、损伤与死亡事件。
An important aspect of VAERS is that anyone can both read and post vaccine adverse events to this database. So if your doctor discounts your concerns about vaccination (or afterward, if your child regresses or gets ill after a vaccine), you can verify or report them yourself -- and people are doing just that when doctors or other vaccine providers refuse to report to VAERS after a vaccine reaction occurs.
“疫苗负面事件报告系统”的一个重要方面是，任何人士都可以阅读该系统数据库中的疫苗负面事件报告，也可以向这个系统提交这样的报告。因此，如果你的医生不考虑你对疫苗注射提出的担心（或者不考虑注射疫苗后出现的异常或病症），你可以访问该系统阅读其他的报告进行自己的验证，或者可以自己提交注射疫苗后出现异常或病症的报告 – 当医生或其他疫苗提供方在发生疫苗反应后拒绝报告时，人们就是这样做。
You can access VAERS here, or you can go to Medalarts.org, which provides an easy, powerful search engine for looking up specific reactions or vaccines in the VAERS database. With over 70 vaccines included, VAERS is an excellent tool that can help you read descriptions of vaccine reactions and identify which vaccines are associated with the most side effects.
你可以直接访问“疫苗负面事件报告系统”（VAERS），或者访问http://www.Medalarts.org ，后者提供对VAERS系统数据库中特定反应或特定疫苗的一个使用方便、强有力的搜索引擎。包括有70多种疫苗的VAERS系统数据库是一个优良的工具，可以帮助你阅读疫苗反应的描述，并且识别哪些疫苗与绝大部分副作用相关联。
It is important to know, though, that only a tiny fraction of serious health problems that occur after vaccination are actually reported. Studies have estimated that less than 10 percent, to as little as ONE percent of vaccine side effects are ever reported to VAERS, so the true side effects are easily FAR higher than the statistics show.
了解下述情况很重要，注射疫苗以后出现的严重健康问题中实际上仅有很小数量实际进行报告。研究表明，少到10%，以至更少到1%的疫苗副作用事件最终被报告给VAERS系统，因此真实的副作用比例很容易远远高于VAERS系统数据库表明的统计数字。
Are You Ready to Get Educated About Vaccines?
你准备好获得关于疫苗的教育没有？
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is clearly the leading Internet resource, providing objective, unbiased information that you will need to make intelligent, informed decisions about which vaccines you, your children or other members of your family may want to use.
国家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）明显是这方面领先的互联网信息来源，提供帮助你对你自己、你的孩子以及你家里其他成员可能需要注射哪些疫苗做出聪明的、知情情况下决定的客观的、非偏见的信息。
If you have further questions about vaccination, make sure you consult a trusted health care professional, who has taken the time to become educated personally about vaccines. And if your doctor threatens or belittles you, refuses to treat your family if you want to use an alternative vaccination schedule, or will not take the time to discuss your vaccine concerns with you and allow you to make informed, voluntary vaccination decisions, I suggest you find one who will. Remember, it is your choice and your responsibility to get educated about vaccination, and your doctor should treat you with respect and work with you on this.
如果你们对于疫苗注射有进一步的问题，一定确保自己向一位值得信任的保健专业人士进行咨询，他曾花费时间使自己成为关于疫苗的受过教育的人士。而且，如果你的医生在你们要求使用另外可选择的疫苗注射安排情况下威胁或轻视你，或者不愿意花费时间与你讨论你对于疫苗的担心是你能够做出知情情况下自愿接受疫苗注射的决定，我建议你找到另外能够这样做的医生。请记住，是你自己的选择以及你自己的责任获得关于疫苗的教育，你的医生应当在这个问题上尊重你和配合你。
I also encourage you to get involved with the work that NVIC is doing to protect your right to choose which vaccines you want your children to get, including the legal right to use all, some, or no vaccines at all. Register for the free NVIC Advocacy Portal that educates you about threats to your legal right to make vaccine choices and puts you directly in contact with your elected state representatives so you can help protect vaccine exemptions in your state. Stay informed about what is happening in your state and make your voice heard.
我也鼓励你参与国家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）在从事的工作，他们工作的目的是保护你选择你愿意你的孩子接受何种疫苗注射的权利，包括接受所有疫苗注射、选择其中一部分以至全部不选择的法律权利。你可以免费注册你的NVIC拥护者入口，它将教育你了解对你的做出疫苗注射选择的权利可能面临的威胁，同时安排你与被选举的你们州的代表直接联系，以便你可以在你们州帮助保护疫苗免注射权。你应当保持了解你们州与此有关情况的进展，同时让人们听到你的声音。
Go to www.NVICAdvocacy.org and register today to take action.
建议你访问www.NVICAdvocacy.org并且今天注册采取行动。
Source: Health Freedoms September 6, 2011：Vaccines Are Dangerous – The Government Says So!
信息来源：《健康自由网站》2011年9月6日文章《疫苗有危险 – 政府这样说！》
http://healthfreedoms.org/2011/09/06/vaccines-are-dangerous-the-government-says-so/
Source: Institute of Medicine: Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality August 25, 2011
信息来源：美国政府《药学研究所网站》2011年8月25日论文《疫苗的负面影响：证据与因果关系》
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx
Source: Public Health Reports:Extra-immunization as a clinical indicator for fragmentation of care, July-August 2011; 126 Suppl 2: 48-59
信息来源：公共健康报告《作为（缺乏统一系统的—译注）分裂性保健临床标志的额外免疫》，发表于：公共健康报告，2011年7月-8月；126增刊2：48-50
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21812169
Source: Green Med Info: Extra-immunization is associated with receiving immunizations from multiple providers and multiple facility types.
信息来源：绿色医学信息：额外免疫与从多重提供方与多重保健机构接受免疫相关
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/extra-immunization-associated-receiving-immunizations-multiple-providers-and-multiple-facili
Related Links:
相关链接：
A Parent's Horrid Nightmare: Coming Soon to YOUR State?
一位孩子家长可怕的噩梦：很快也来到你的州？
Should Pediatricians 'Fire' Patients Whose Parents Don't Vaccinate?
小儿科医生是否有权“开除”不接受疫苗注射的家长的患儿（节录）
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/08/18/should-pediatricians-fire-patients-whose-parents-dont-vaccinate.aspx
One of the Most Inexcusable Vaccine Revelations of All...
最为不可宽恕的揭露出来的与疫苗有关的事（节录）：
本文相关系列必须一起研究的文章：
美国科学家揭示人类自然产生免疫力与疫苗激发免疫力的区别
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du25.html
疫苗厂商幕后推动儿童广泛疫苗注射优先关乎健康还是利润
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du24.html
美国科学家不久前揭露出来的与疫苗有关最为不可宽恕的事
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du21.html
美国FDA发现疫苗生产厂疫苗小瓶中有热缩塑料包装碎片
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du20.html
疫苗给世界3000万儿童注射后才发现遭到动物病毒污染
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du1x.html
美国政府医学研究所承认注射疫苗有严重副作用！
关键词：疫苗 疫苗副作用 疫苗机制 疫苗污染 病毒 流产胚细胞 危害健康
美国政府药学研究所（IOM）在审查了1000多项疫苗研究之后发现14种危险的副作用与注射疫苗相关后不久前承认：“疫苗并非无副作用，或并非无‘负面作用’” 。美国国家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）关于药学研究所（IOM）的报告最近发表的声明强调“这次的审查受到有关疫苗负面影响知识缺口的束缚”；“真相是，没有任何人知道在美国有多少疫苗受害者：没有人知道在每6个孩子中为什么有一名有学习障碍的孩子；或者每9个孩子中为什么有一名有气喘的孩子；或者每100个美国人中为什么有1名患孤独症；或者每450个美国人中为什么有1名患糖尿病，他们的慢性抑郁症、疾病与残疾能够回追到疫苗反应，这些疫苗反应过去百年来一直被公共健康官员与医生们忽略不考虑为仅仅是‘巧合’”。本文及其系列文章还揭示：注射疫苗并不时我们更加健康；自然免疫力与疫苗激发免疫力的区别？世界最知名葛兰素--史克疫苗生产公司疫苗对美国百万儿童、对世界各地3000多万儿童注射后竟然发现受到猪病毒DNA的污染；长期以来向公众掩盖的一项令人震惊的事实：某些疫苗生产中与美容护肤霜中使用了人类流产胚细胞；无良商家与官方勾结推动某些疫苗的真正目的是利润而非健康！
Vaccines Have Serious Side Effects The Institute of Medicine Says So!
美国政府医学研究所承认：注射疫苗有严重副作用！
转载自：
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/09/27/vaccines-are-dangerous-says-the-government.aspx?e_cid=20111002_SNL_MS_1
翻译与转载者：陈一文（cheniwan@mx.cei.gov.cn）
（80年代两届全国青联委员）
《新浪网》“陈一文顾问博客”转载：http://blog.sina.com.cn/cheniwan
《陈一文顾问网站》：http://sea3000.net/cheniwan
By Dr. Mercola | September 27 2011
作者：莫克拉博士 发布日期：2011年9月27日
As I have long stated, and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) now admits:
如同我早就声明的那样，美国政府药学研究所（Institute of Medicine -- IOM）现在也承认：
"Vaccines are not free from side effects, or "adverse effects""
“疫苗并非无副作用，或并非无‘负面作用’”
This admission came after a review of more than 1,000 vaccine studies, which was intended to assess the scientific evidence in the medical literature about specific adverse events associated with eight vaccines for measles, mumps, rubella (MMR); varicella (chickenpox); influenza; hepatitis A; hepatitis B; HPV; diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis (DtaP); and meningococcal.
这一点是在审查了1000多项疫苗研究之后承认的。这些疫苗研究的目的是评估医学文献中关于八种具体的疫苗相关的特点负面作用的科学证据。这八种疫苗针对（1）麻疹--腮腺炎--风疹MMR疫苗（measles-- mumps--rubella – MMR）；（2）水痘（varicella – chickenpox）；（3）流行性感冒（influenza）；（4）甲型肝炎（hepatitis A）；（5）乙型肝炎（hepatitis B）；（6）人乳头状病毒（HPV）；（7）白喉（diphtheria）、破伤风（tetanus）、非细胞的百日咳（acellular pertussis – DtaP）；与 （8）脑膜炎（meningococca）。
The adverse events selected for IOM review were ones for which people had submitted vaccine injury claims to the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). A convincing causal relationship was found for 14 adverse events and certain vaccines.
药学研究所选择进行审查的疫苗负面事件是人们提交给“疫苗损伤赔偿计划（Vaccine Injury Compensation Program -- VICP）的疫苗损伤索赔中报告的负面事件。对某些疫苗发现令人信服的因果关系的14种负面事件。
14 Dangerous Side Effects Linked to Vaccination, IOM Report Says
美国政府医学研究所承认：有14种危险的副作用与注射疫苗相关
In the first comprehensive safety review in nearly two decades, the Institute of Medicine found convincing scientic evidence for a causal relationship between certain vaccines and serious adverse health outcomes. This includes:
近二十年来第一次这样的综合性安全审查中，美国政府医学研究所发现了某些疫苗与严重的负面健康结果之间的有说服力的科学证据。它们包括：
Chickenpox Vaccine
水痘疫苗
l Vaccine strain varicella zoster infection after vaccination without other organ involvement;
l 疫苗注射后出现了不涉及其他器官的疫苗株水痘带状疹子感染；
l Vaccine strain varicella zoster infection and subsequent infection resulting in pneumonia, encephalitis, meningitis or hepatitis in individuals with demonstrated immunodeficiences;
l 疫苗株水痘带状疹子感染以及随后在表现免疫缺陷的个人中造成肺炎（pneumonia）、 脑炎（encephalitis）、脑膜炎（meningitis）或肝炎（hepatitis）。
Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) Vaccine
麻疹—腮腺炎—风疹（MMR）疫苗
l Measles inclusion body encephalitis
l 麻疹包涵体脑炎
l Febrile seizures, a type of seizure that occurs in infants and young children in association with fever
l 急性发热（Febrile seizures），在婴幼儿与儿童发生的伴随发烧的一种急性症
l Short-term joint pain (arthralgia) in children and women
l 儿童与妇女中出现短期关节痛（arthralgia）
Other findings revealed:
其他的发现揭示：
l Six types of vaccines -- MMR, varicella zoster (chickenpox), influenza, hepatitis B, meningococcal, and tetanus-containing vaccines -- are linked to anaphylaxis (severe, potentially life-threatening allergic reaction). The HPV vaccine was also linked to anaphylaxis in yeast-sensitive individuals.
l 六种疫苗 -- （1）麻疹--腮腺炎--风疹MMR疫苗（measles-- mumps--rubella – MMR）、（2）水痘带状疹子疫苗（varicella zoster, chickenpox）、（3）流行性感冒疫苗（influenza）、（4）乙型肝炎疫苗（hepatitis B）、（5）脑膜炎疫苗（meningococcal）与（6）破伤风疫苗（tetanus）与过敏反应（anaphylaxis）有关联（严重的、潜在危害生命的过敏反应）。人乳头状病毒疫苗也与酵母过敏个人中的过敏反应（anaphylaxis）相关。
l Injection of any vaccine in general can lead to sudden fainting (syncope) and symptoms of deltoid bursitis, or shoulder inflammation
l 注射任何这些疫苗总的来讲能够导致土壤昏晕昏厥（syncope）以及三角肌滑液囊炎（deltoid bursitis），或者肩膀炎症（inflammation）。
l Two Canadian flu vaccines were linked to oculo-respiratory syndrome characterized by conjunctivitis, facial swelling, and mild respiratory symptoms.
l 两种加拿大流行性感冒疫苗与奥库拉呼吸系统综合症（oculo-respiratory syndrome）相关，特征包括结膜炎（conjunctivitis）、面部肿胀（facial swelling）以及温和的呼吸系统症状（mild respiratory symptoms）。
l Scientific research suggests that many people, who experience an adverse reaction to vaccines, have individual susceptibility that can make them at higher risk for experiencing acute and chronic health problems after vaccination due to biodiversity (genetic variations) within populations; age at the time of vaccination; immune deficiencies; coinciding infections/illnesses; and other environmental exposures, (such as toxins, traumas).
l 科学研究提议，对疫苗有负面反应经历的许多人，具有个性化的易受损害脆弱性，使他们在相同人群中在疫苗注射后对急性的与慢性的健康问题因下述因素具有更高风险，如生物多样性（基因不同）；注射疫苗的年龄与时间；免疫缺陷；同时有感染/疾病；其他环境性暴露（如毒素、外伤）。
Too Little Evidence Available to Effectively Evaluate Most Side Effects
对评估大部分副作用来讲可以获得的证据太少
Despite conclusive findings by IOM linking certain vaccines to brain inflammation, febrile seizures and potentially life-threatening infections like pneumonia and meningitis in susceptible individuals, most of the media headlines about the IOM’s 600-page report are spinning the reports conclusions and stating that “few adverse effects are caused by the vaccines reviewed in this report.”
尽管美国政府药学研究所（IOM）确凿发现某些疫苗与某些症状有关联，如脑部炎症（brain inflammation）、急性发热（febrile seizures）、已遭受损害脆弱个人中像肺炎（pneumonia）与脑膜炎（meningitis）这样的潜在威胁生命的感染，大部分媒体关于药学研究所（IOM）这个600页报告的头条将报告的结论描绘为“这个报告伸出了疫苗造成的少数一些负面影响。”
The truth is that the IOM Committee came to this startling conclusion, which they admitted openly and that is:
真实的情况是药学研究所获得他们令人震惊的结论时公开承认
"For the vast majority, (135 vaccine-adverse event pairs), the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship."
“对绝大多数，（135项疫苗—负面事件对），获得的证据不足于接受或者否定一项因果关系。”
In other words, for the majority of side effects and health conditions that have occurred in conjunction with vaccinations, they simply have no idea whether the vaccine caused the problem or not. In fact, the IOM Committee warned that there should be no misinterpretation of the fact that they DO NOT KNOW whether or not more than 100 very serious reported health problems linked to the eight vaccines they studied are caused by those vaccines. In most cases, the Committee was unable to come to a conclusion because there are no or very few scientific studies investigating the reported vaccine-related adverse event or the studies, which are published in the medical literature, are methodologically flawed in some way.
换句话说，对于与疫苗注射后发生的大部分副作用与健康状况而言，他们完全不懂疫苗注射是否导致出现了的问题。事实上，药学研究所的委员会警告，对如下情况不应做误导性解释：他们不知道100种所报告的与八种疫苗相关联的非常严重健康问题是由这些疫苗造成的，还是不是由它们造成的。在大部分情况下，该委员会未能够取得结论的原因，是因为医学文献中仅发表了很少对疫苗相关负面事件或研究进行审查的科学研究论文，而且它们采用的方法学在一定程度上有缺陷。
And isn’t this precisely the problem? The current vaccination schedule is a one-size-fits-all approach that has never been proven safe!
这不准确就是问题所在？目前的疫苗安排是“同一剂量满足所有的人”的方式，但是这种方式从来没有证实是安全的！
As Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), stated:
如芭芭拉·罗·费舍（Barbara Loe Fisher），国家疫苗信息中心（National Vaccine Information Center -- NVIC）创立者强调：
"The truth is, nobody knows how many vaccine victims there are in America, how many of the 1 in 6 learning disabled children; or the 1 in 9 with asthma; or the 1 in 100 who develop autism; or the 1 in 450 who become diabetic, can trace their chronic inflammation, disease and disability back to vaccine reactions that have been dismissed by public health officials and doctors for the past century as just "a coincidence.""
“真相是，没有任何人知道在美国有多少疫苗受害者：没有人知道在每6个孩子中为什么有一名有学习障碍（learning disabled）的孩子；或者每9个孩子中为什么有一名有气喘（asthma）的孩子；或者每100个美国人中为什么有1名患孤独症（autism）；或者每450个美国人中为什么有1名患糖尿病（diabetic），他们的慢性抑郁症（inflammation）、疾病与残疾能够回追到疫苗反应，这些疫苗反应过去百年来一直被公共健康官员与医生们忽略不考虑为仅仅是‘巧合’”。
Or, if they aren’t dismissed as coincidence, they are dismissed on the grounds that there’s not enough data available to establish a “causal relationship.” This is exactly the reason why unbiased vaccine safety studies are so desperately and urgently need.
或者，如果它们没有作为“巧合”忽略不考虑，它们在没有建立“因果关系”足够数据基础上不予考虑。这就是为什么无偏见的疫苗安全研究如此紧急必要。
NVIC recently issued a statement regarding IOM's new report, noting this very fact:
国家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）最近发表了关于美国政府药学研究所新的报告的一个声明，特别关注这一事实：
"The [IOM] Committee was hampered by the same gaps in knowledge regarding vaccine adverse effects that hampered IOM Committees undertaking the same task in 1991 and 1994. For the majority of potential vaccine adverse effects reported to be associated with vaccines, this IOM Committee like those before, came to the conclusion that the biological mechanism and epidemiological evidence published in the medical literature is simply inadequate to accept or reject a causation finding.
“（药学研究所）委员会这次的审查受到有关疫苗负面影响知识缺口的束缚，与药学研究所委员会1991年与1994年承担同样任务时受到的有关疫苗负面影响知识缺口束缚相同。对于报告中涉及到的与疫苗相关联的大部分潜在疫苗负面影响，这个药学研究所委员会像他们以前一样，得到结论：医学文献中发表的鸭血生物学机制与流行病学证据不足以接受或否定一项显示因果关系的发现。
This is a very important conclusion, because the current state of science holds no answers for parents and doctors, who for many years have reported multiple vaccine injuries to the government's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
“这是一项重要的结论，因为目前状态的科学对孩子们的家长与医生们给不出答案，他们多年来向政府的‘疫苗负面事件报告系统（Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System -- VAERS）’报告了多重疫苗损伤。
Insufficient scientific evidence to make a call about whether certain vaccines do or do not cause a wide range of serious health conditions, such as encephalitis, encephalopathy, stroke, asthma, autism, SIDS, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, lupus, and blood disorders, is problematical when these vaccines are mandated by law to be used by every child and recommended for many adults.
“对与某些疫苗是或者不造成广泛范围严重健康状况，例如脑炎（encephalitis）、脑病（encephalopathy）、中风（stroke）、哮喘（asthma）、孤独症（autism）、婴儿猝死综合症（SIDS）、多发性硬化症（multiple sclerosis）、关节炎（arthritis）、狼疮（lupus）以及血液失调（blood disorders），在法规强制规定对每个孩子以及推荐对许多成年人注射这些疫苗情况下，由于缺乏足够科学证据而不能发出警告就成了一个大问题。
The Committee's clear acknowledgement that there is a lack of adequate scientific understanding about the way that vaccines act in the human body, including how, when, why and for whom they are harmful, is confirmation that more and higher quality vaccine safety science is urgently needed."
（药学研究所）委员会清楚承认缺乏关于疫苗在人类体内如何如何作用的足够科学理解，包括缺乏各种疫苗如何、何时、为什么以及它们对什么样的人有害的足够科学理解，这确认目前紧急需要高质量的疫苗安全科学。”
Why Are So Many Children Receiving Extra Vaccines?
为什么这么多的孩子注射额外次数疫苗？
Adding insult to injury, a separate review by independent researchers looking at the 1999-2003 National Immunization Survey data found that nearly 10 percent of children aged 19-35 months have received extra vaccinations and the rate was highest for children who received vaccines at more than one facility or from more than one provider. This is the last thing that kids need, considering that just about every year one or more “new” vaccines are added to the already overloaded schedule.
令疫苗造成的损伤更为糟糕，由独立研究者们进行的一项单独的审查对1999-2003年度国家免疫调查（National Immunization Survey）数据进行了研究，发现19-35个月年龄儿童的10%获得额外次数疫苗注射，而且，对于从一家以上机构或多家提供方获得疫苗的儿童的额外疫苗次数最高。这是孩子们所需要的最后一件事，特别考虑到每年出现一种或更多种“新”的疫苗出现加入到目前已经过载的安排。
As it stands, children are expected to get 48 doses of 14 vaccines by the time they’re just 6 years old – starting with the first vaccine given on the day of birth in the newborn nursery! By age 18, federal public health officials say they should have gotten a total of 69 doses of 16 vaccines.
从目前情况看，现在的孩子到他们6岁时生长过程中应期望注射14种疫苗总共注射48次 – 从出生第一天在新生儿室注射第一次疫苗开始！到18岁时，联邦公共健康官员说，他们注射了16种总共69次疫苗。
This “prescription” is the same for every U.S. child, even though it’s well known that all children are not the same biologically – as the recent Institute of Medicine report clearly points out - and some children will not be able to survive the currently recommended vaccine schedule without suffering serious harm to their health. And if you take your child to multiple health care providers or facilities, the odds are high that they may be mistakenly given “extra” vaccines on top of the recommended schedule.
美国每一个孩子获得相同这样的“处方”，尽管人们都了解所有的孩子在生物学方面并不相同 – 如同药学研究所最近的报告清楚指出的那样 – 某些孩子不能承受目前推荐的疫苗安排因而造成对他们健康严重的损伤。如果你带你的孩子去多家保健服务提供者或机构的话，他们错误地“额外”注射他们最为推荐安排的疫苗的几率较高。
To avoid this, if you do decide to vaccinate, be sure you keep a detailed record of which vaccinations your child has received, and when – do not rely on your doctor’s office to do that for you. It is also a good idea to have your child’s vaccination history on hand in the event there is a vaccine reaction.
为了避免这种情况，如果你决定注射疫苗的话，一定确保你保留这你的孩子过去注射过的所有疫苗的详细记录，以及何时注射 – 而不要依赖于你的医生的办公室为你这样做。出现疫苗反应时，随身携带你的孩子的疫苗注射历史记录是一个好主意。
You Can View Common Vaccine Reactions Right Now
你现在可以看通常的疫苗反应
The IOM report may feel there is too little evidence to make conclusions about vaccine-induced side effects, but you can make a conclusion for yourself by reading the entire IOM report yourself at:
药学研究所可能感到做出对某些疫苗导致副作用结论的证据过少，但是你可以通过读整个报告做出自己的结论：
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx
You can also review the vaccine adverse event reports made by doctors and patients or parents themselves to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national surveillance database to which anyone can post a vaccine reaction report. VAERS was established in 1986 under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which requires health professionals to report serious health problems, including hospitalizations, injuries and deaths, that occur after the administration of routinely recommended vaccines.
你也可以审查医生与患者或者家长们自己向联邦“疫苗负面事件报告系统”（Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System -- VAERS）的疫苗负面事件报告。这是任何人可以提交疫苗反应报告的国家监视网。“疫苗负面事件报告系统”1986年依据“国家儿童疫苗损伤法令”（National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act）建立，要求健康专业人士报告严重的健康问题，包括注射常规推荐一秒后发生的住院治疗、损伤与死亡事件。
An important aspect of VAERS is that anyone can both read and post vaccine adverse events to this database. So if your doctor discounts your concerns about vaccination (or afterward, if your child regresses or gets ill after a vaccine), you can verify or report them yourself -- and people are doing just that when doctors or other vaccine providers refuse to report to VAERS after a vaccine reaction occurs.
“疫苗负面事件报告系统”的一个重要方面是，任何人士都可以阅读该系统数据库中的疫苗负面事件报告，也可以向这个系统提交这样的报告。因此，如果你的医生不考虑你对疫苗注射提出的担心（或者不考虑注射疫苗后出现的异常或病症），你可以访问该系统阅读其他的报告进行自己的验证，或者可以自己提交注射疫苗后出现异常或病症的报告 – 当医生或其他疫苗提供方在发生疫苗反应后拒绝报告时，人们就是这样做。
You can access VAERS here, or you can go to Medalarts.org, which provides an easy, powerful search engine for looking up specific reactions or vaccines in the VAERS database. With over 70 vaccines included, VAERS is an excellent tool that can help you read descriptions of vaccine reactions and identify which vaccines are associated with the most side effects.
你可以直接访问“疫苗负面事件报告系统”（VAERS），或者访问http://www.Medalarts.org ，后者提供对VAERS系统数据库中特定反应或特定疫苗的一个使用方便、强有力的搜索引擎。包括有70多种疫苗的VAERS系统数据库是一个优良的工具，可以帮助你阅读疫苗反应的描述，并且识别哪些疫苗与绝大部分副作用相关联。
It is important to know, though, that only a tiny fraction of serious health problems that occur after vaccination are actually reported. Studies have estimated that less than 10 percent, to as little as ONE percent of vaccine side effects are ever reported to VAERS, so the true side effects are easily FAR higher than the statistics show.
了解下述情况很重要，注射疫苗以后出现的严重健康问题中实际上仅有很小数量实际进行报告。研究表明，少到10%，以至更少到1%的疫苗副作用事件最终被报告给VAERS系统，因此真实的副作用比例很容易远远高于VAERS系统数据库表明的统计数字。
Are You Ready to Get Educated About Vaccines?
你准备好获得关于疫苗的教育没有？
The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) is clearly the leading Internet resource, providing objective, unbiased information that you will need to make intelligent, informed decisions about which vaccines you, your children or other members of your family may want to use.
国家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）明显是这方面领先的互联网信息来源，提供帮助你对你自己、你的孩子以及你家里其他成员可能需要注射哪些疫苗做出聪明的、知情情况下决定的客观的、非偏见的信息。
If you have further questions about vaccination, make sure you consult a trusted health care professional, who has taken the time to become educated personally about vaccines. And if your doctor threatens or belittles you, refuses to treat your family if you want to use an alternative vaccination schedule, or will not take the time to discuss your vaccine concerns with you and allow you to make informed, voluntary vaccination decisions, I suggest you find one who will. Remember, it is your choice and your responsibility to get educated about vaccination, and your doctor should treat you with respect and work with you on this.
如果你们对于疫苗注射有进一步的问题，一定确保自己向一位值得信任的保健专业人士进行咨询，他曾花费时间使自己成为关于疫苗的受过教育的人士。而且，如果你的医生在你们要求使用另外可选择的疫苗注射安排情况下威胁或轻视你，或者不愿意花费时间与你讨论你对于疫苗的担心是你能够做出知情情况下自愿接受疫苗注射的决定，我建议你找到另外能够这样做的医生。请记住，是你自己的选择以及你自己的责任获得关于疫苗的教育，你的医生应当在这个问题上尊重你和配合你。
I also encourage you to get involved with the work that NVIC is doing to protect your right to choose which vaccines you want your children to get, including the legal right to use all, some, or no vaccines at all. Register for the free NVIC Advocacy Portal that educates you about threats to your legal right to make vaccine choices and puts you directly in contact with your elected state representatives so you can help protect vaccine exemptions in your state. Stay informed about what is happening in your state and make your voice heard.
我也鼓励你参与国家疫苗信息中心（NVIC）在从事的工作，他们工作的目的是保护你选择你愿意你的孩子接受何种疫苗注射的权利，包括接受所有疫苗注射、选择其中一部分以至全部不选择的法律权利。你可以免费注册你的NVIC拥护者入口，它将教育你了解对你的做出疫苗注射选择的权利可能面临的威胁，同时安排你与被选举的你们州的代表直接联系，以便你可以在你们州帮助保护疫苗免注射权。你应当保持了解你们州与此有关情况的进展，同时让人们听到你的声音。
Go to www.NVICAdvocacy.org and register today to take action.
建议你访问www.NVICAdvocacy.org并且今天注册采取行动。
Source: Health Freedoms September 6, 2011：Vaccines Are Dangerous – The Government Says So!
信息来源：《健康自由网站》2011年9月6日文章《疫苗有危险 – 政府这样说！》
http://healthfreedoms.org/2011/09/06/vaccines-are-dangerous-the-government-says-so/
Source: Institute of Medicine: Adverse Effects of Vaccines: Evidence and Causality August 25, 2011
信息来源：美国政府《药学研究所网站》2011年8月25日论文《疫苗的负面影响：证据与因果关系》
http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Adverse-Effects-of-Vaccines-Evidence-and-Causality.aspx
Source: Public Health Reports:Extra-immunization as a clinical indicator for fragmentation of care, July-August 2011; 126 Suppl 2: 48-59
信息来源：公共健康报告《作为（缺乏统一系统的—译注）分裂性保健临床标志的额外免疫》，发表于：公共健康报告，2011年7月-8月；126增刊2：48-50
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21812169
Source: Green Med Info: Extra-immunization is associated with receiving immunizations from multiple providers and multiple facility types.
信息来源：绿色医学信息：额外免疫与从多重提供方与多重保健机构接受免疫相关
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/extra-immunization-associated-receiving-immunizations-multiple-providers-and-multiple-facili
Related Links:
相关链接：
A Parent's Horrid Nightmare: Coming Soon to YOUR State?
一位孩子家长可怕的噩梦：很快也来到你的州？
Should Pediatricians 'Fire' Patients Whose Parents Don't Vaccinate?
小儿科医生是否有权“开除”不接受疫苗注射的家长的患儿（节录）
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/08/18/should-pediatricians-fire-patients-whose-parents-dont-vaccinate.aspx
One of the Most Inexcusable Vaccine Revelations of All...
最为不可宽恕的揭露出来的与疫苗有关的事（节录）：
本文相关系列必须一起研究的文章：
美国科学家揭示人类自然产生免疫力与疫苗激发免疫力的区别
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du25.html
疫苗厂商幕后推动儿童广泛疫苗注射优先关乎健康还是利润
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du24.html
美国科学家不久前揭露出来的与疫苗有关最为不可宽恕的事
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du21.html
美国FDA发现疫苗生产厂疫苗小瓶中有热缩塑料包装碎片
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du20.html
疫苗给世界3000万儿童注射后才发现遭到动物病毒污染
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_4bb17e9d0102du1x.html
美国科学家揭示人类自然产生免疫力与疫苗激发免疫力的区别
关键词：疫苗 疫苗注射 疫苗作用 激发免疫力 自然免疫力
存在一种误解，说你的孩子需要疫苗才能保持健康。没有任何疾病由于“疫苗缺乏”而造成。事实上，从来不生病的人的秘密之一揭示，他们从来不注射疫苗。加强你的免疫系统成为一个“精干的、有效的、与疾病战斗的武器”的关键，取决于你的生活方式习惯 – 健康食品、消除压力、锻炼身体、睡眠、暴露于阳光等等。人为用疫苗人操控你的免疫系统与此不同，也不会产生同样期望的与疾病战斗的结果。疫苗导致的免疫力与自然免疫力的一项主要区别，来自你如何暴露于这些生物体。莫科拉博士向民众深入浅出的解释，揭示了疫苗生产商以及推动向儿童大范围强制性注射疫苗的有关部门向绝大部分民众掩盖的真相。
自然免疫力与疫苗激发免疫力的区别？
Quoted from: Should Pediatricians 'Fire' Patients Whose Parents Don't Vaccinate?
节录自：小儿科医生是否有权“开除”不接受疫苗注射的家长的患儿
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/08/18/should-pediatricians-fire-patients-whose-parents-dont-vaccinate.aspx
翻译与转载者：陈一文（cheniwan@mx.cei.gov.cn）
（80年代两届全国青联委员）
《新浪网》“陈一文顾问博客”转载：http://blog.sina.com.cn/cheniwan
《陈一文顾问网站》：http://sea3000.net/cheniwan
By Dr. Mercola August 18 2011
作者：莫克拉博士 发表日期：2011年8月18日
Vaccines do Not "Make" You Healthy
疫苗并不“使”你健康
There is a misconception, one that is perpetuated by many pediatricians in the United States, that you need vaccines to stay well. No disease is caused by a "vaccine deficiency." In fact, in my recent article featuring the top secrets of people who never get sick, vaccination is nowhere to be found.
存在一种误解，在美国被许多小儿科医生企图使人牢记不忘的误解，说你需要疫苗才能保持健康。没有任何疾病由于“疫苗缺乏”而造成。事实上，我最新的文章从来不生病的人的秘密揭示，他们从来不注射疫苗。
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/01/28/the-secrets-of-never-getting-sick.aspx
Why?
为什么？
Because, ultimately, it is the state of your immune system that determines whether or not you get sick when you're exposed to an infectious disease. The keys to boosting your immune system into a "lean, mean, disease-fighting machine" lie in your lifestyle habits -- healthy food, stress relief, exercise, sleep, exposure to sunlight and so on. Artificially manipulating your immune system with a vaccine is not the same thing, nor does it produce the same desired disease-fighting result.
因为，你暴露于某种感染性的疾病后，决定你是否生病的最终因素，是你的免疫系统的状态。加强你的免疫系统成为一个“精干的、有效的、与疾病战斗的武器”的关键，取决于你的生活方式习惯 – 健康食品、消除压力、锻炼身体、睡眠、暴露于阳光等等。人为用疫苗人操控你的免疫系统与此不同，也不会产生同样期望的与疾病战斗的结果。
What is the Difference Between Natural and Vaccine-Induced Immunity?
自然免疫力与疫苗激发免疫力的区别？
Many still believe vaccines provide the same kind of immunity as is provided when you naturally heal from an infection, and this widespread misconception needs to be corrected.
很多人依然相信疫苗能够提供由感染自然痊愈时的同样免疫力效果，这种广泛传播的误解需要修正。
The presumed result of a vaccination is to help you build immunity to potentially harmful organisms that cause disease. Now, your body's immune system is already designed to do this in response to infectious organisms that you are exposed to naturally. One major difference between vaccine-induced immunity and natural immunity stems from how you're exposed to these organisms.
注射疫苗假定的结果是帮助你对造成疾病的潜在生物体建立免疫力。实际上，你的身体的免疫系统现在就已经设计得能够对你自然条件下接触的感染性生物体做出这样的反应。疫苗导致的免疫力与自然免疫力的一项主要区别，来自你如何暴露于这些生物体。
Most disease-causing organisms enter your body through the mucous membranes of your nose, mouth, lungs or your digestive tract.
大部分导致疾病的生物体通过你的鼻子、嘴、肺或者你的消化管的黏膜（mucous membranes）进入你体内。
These mucous membranes have their own immune system, called the secretory IgA immune system. It is a different system from the one activated when a vaccine is injected into your body. Your IgA immune system is your body's first line of defense and its job is to deal with infectious microorganisms at their exposure points, reducing or even eliminating the need for activation of your body's entire immune system.
这些黏膜具有自己的免疫系统，称之为分泌IgA免疫系统（secretory IgA immune system）。这个免疫系统与疫苗注射进入你体内时启动的免疫系统不同。你的IgA免疫系统是你的身体的第一道防线，它的任务是在接触感染性微生物暴露之处对方它们，减少或以至避免启动你身体的整个免疫系统的必要性。
However, when a lab-altered infectious microorganism is injected into your body in a vaccine, and especially when combined with an immune adjuvant, such as aluminum, your IgA immune system is bypassed, stimulating your immune system to mount a very strong inflammatory response. Vaccines can also trigger such a strong inflammatory response that the inflammation becomes chronic and leads to chronic illness or disability. (People with a personal or family history of severe allergy or autoimmunity should be cautious about vaccination because they already have a genetic predisposition to inflammatory responses that do not resolve and can lead to chronic health problems.)
然而，当某种实验室内已经修正了的感染性微生物以疫苗的方式注射进入你体内时，特别当这种疫苗与例如铝等某种免疫辅佐物结合时，它们越过了你的IgA免疫系统，刺激你身体的整个免疫系统做出非常强烈的发炎性反应。疫苗触发的这种强烈的发炎性反应可能造成变为慢性的并导致慢性疾病或伤残。（凡本人或家庭病史有严重过敏或自身免疫症（autoimmunity）的人士应当对疫苗注射几位谨慎，因为它们对炎症性反应的遗传倾向（genetic predisposition）不但不解决问题而且可能导致慢性健康问题。）
Injecting these lab-altered microorganisms into your body to provoke an atypical, temporary immunity is clearly not the same way your body develops a naturally acquired type of immunity. Your immune system simply was not designed to be injected with lab altered disease-causing organisms in this manner. This is one reason why vaccines almost always only provide temporary, not permanent, immunity. Additionally, this plays a large role in why vaccines have the potential to do serious damage to your health.
将这种实验室内已经修正的微生物注射进入你的身体以期激起某种非典型的、临时性的免疫力，与你的身体发展某种自然获得类型的免疫力的方式显然不同。你的免疫系统根本不是设计来以这种方式注射实验室内修正过的导致疾病的生物体。这就是疫苗为什么几乎总是提供临时性的而非永久性的免疫力的原因之一。此外，这种情况对于疫苗为什么对你的健康造成潜在严重损害也扮演重要作用。
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/08/06/vaccine-increases-narcolepsy-by-660-percent.aspx
Since vaccines bypass your natural first-line defense (your lgA immune system), they are never 100 percent protective because they provide only temporary, typically inferior immunity compared to that your body would acquire by experiencing and healing from the natural disease.
由于疫苗越过了你身体的天然的第一道防线（你的IgA免疫系统），它们永远不是100%保护性的，因为，与你的身体通过精力和从自然疾病中康复过程中获得的免疫力相比，疫苗仅能够提供临时性的、典型的劣等的免疫力。
疫苗厂商幕后推动儿童广泛疫苗注射优先关乎健康还是利润
关键词：疫苗 疫苗注射 疫苗副作用 疫苗机制 疫苗污染 病毒 危害健康
医药公司及其医药游说者密切涉及推动AB499疫苗通过州法规的活动。在剥夺家长对可能损害他们孩子健康的医疗程序做出知情决定的权利后，医药公司可以为他们的Gardasil疫苗开拓新的市场。而且，在没注射一剂疫苗花费政府108美元（社会医疗保障费用—译注）情况下，这种疫苗的生产商默克医药公司（Merck）可能获得令人满意的利润。所提议的该项法规将花费已经严重缺乏财政收入的加利福尼亚数百万美元进行实施。这些钱的大部分将付给默克（Merck）等疫苗生产公司。在没有取得他们家长同意情况下如果孩子因接受疫苗注射受到损伤或出现死亡，是否考虑了应当由谁来负责任？无论医生或者医药公司承担任何法律责任，因此最终还是要孩子的家长承担孩子的治疗费用，如果他们的孩子因疫苗注射受到损伤。疫苗生产商幕后推动儿童广泛疫苗注射，他们优先关乎儿童的健康，还是利润？注射疫苗发生损害儿童医生健康的后果，谁来负责？
Dr. Mercola: AB499 More About Profits than Health
红歌会网 SZHGH.COM
